If a psychologist discovers a colleague's ethical violation that does not harm clients directly, what should be the first course of action?

The appropriate first course of action when a psychologist discovers a colleague's ethical violation that does not directly harm clients is to attempt an informal resolution by discussing the issue. This approach aligns with the principles of ethical practice, which encourage addressing potential violations directly and privately before escalating the matter to formal authorities.

By initiating a conversation with the colleague, the psychologist allows for the possibility of clarification, understanding, or rectification of the behavior in question. This fosters a professional environment where colleagues can support one another in adhering to ethical standards, ultimately promoting integrity within the profession. Additionally, it reflects the guideline that emphasizes the importance of addressing concerns in a manner that is respectful and constructive, prioritizing resolution over confrontation or punitive measures.

While reporting the colleague to authorities or confronting them publicly could be necessary in certain situations, those actions are generally considered more appropriate after attempts at informal resolution have been made, especially if the violation does not pose direct harm. Ignoring the violation is also not recommended, as it could undermine the ethical standards of the profession and impact the trust inherent in professional relationships.