What action is likely from the Ethics Committee if a psychologist's behavior is considered unethical but the consequences are minor?

The Ethics Committee is likely to issue a reprimand when a psychologist's behavior is deemed unethical, especially when the consequences are considered minor. A reprimand acknowledges that the actions in question were inappropriate while also providing an opportunity for the psychologist to learn from the situation and improve their practices.

This action serves both as a form of accountability and as a means of education without resorting to harsher penalties, which may not be warranted given the minor nature of the consequences involved. A reprimand typically does not have long-term impacts on the psychologist's professional standing, allowing them to continue their work while still recognizing the need for ethical standards.

In contrast, other options such as censure, expulsion, or warning might be applicable in scenarios where the severity or potential harm of the unethical behavior is greater, necessitating a more serious response. Therefore, a reprimand is a fitting course of action for minor ethical violations, aligning with the principles of proportionality and rehabilitation within professional ethics.