What feedback can state boards provide when a grievance is filed regarding the EPPP?

The correct choice reflects the type of feedback that state boards are authorized to provide in the context of a grievance related to the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP). When a grievance is filed, state boards aim to uphold the integrity of the examination process while ensuring that examinees have a clear understanding of their performance.

Providing the passing score and descriptive statistics offers examinees valuable context about their test performance. This feedback helps candidates understand how their scores compare to the passing score and how they performed in relation to peers, which is essential for transparency in the testing process. Descriptive statistics can include details such as means, medians, and standard deviations of scores, which can be particularly useful for candidates who want to know more about their performance relative to the overall test-taker population.

The other options do not adequately address the type of information that is typically shared with candidates following a grievance filing. Specific question performance details would compromise test security, and only giving the raw score would not help candidates understand their relative standing concerning the passing requirement or peer performance. Lastly, while the number of grievances filed might be a point of interest, it does not provide any constructive feedback regarding an individual's performance on the examination.