What should a psychologist do when asked to evaluate a child they have previously treated in a custody case?

When a psychologist is asked to evaluate a child they have previously treated in a custody case, it is essential to prioritize ethical considerations and the potential impact of dual relationships. Accepting to conduct an evaluation in this context can jeopardize objectivity, as the previous therapeutic relationship may bias the psychologist's assessment. The American Psychological Association’s ethical guidelines emphasize avoiding dual relationships that may impair professional judgment or create conflicts of interest.

Declining the evaluation due to prior therapeutic involvement is the most responsible action, as it helps maintain the integrity of both the evaluation and the treatment process. By recognizing that their previous interactions with the child could influence their current evaluation, the psychologist demonstrates adherence to ethical standards that seek to protect both the child and the integrity of the custody evaluation process.

This choice aligns with ethical principles that emphasize the importance of maintaining clear boundaries and ensuring that evaluations are fair and impartial. Under these circumstances, referring the request to another qualified psychologist would also be a prudent option, ensuring that the child's best interests are upheld without any potential bias from previous therapeutic work.